Playground Invasion, cont.

Cloudscome’s question to my original post is a good one, and one that I meant to address initially but forgot. I don’t think it’s only White Middle Class entitlement that compels people to ask about a family’s racial/ethnic background or to inquire about how various members are related to one another. There’s straight-up class entitlement, and then there can also be group entitlement–that maybe the black folks who inquire about Cloudscome’s kids feel a right to know because her kids are in some ways one of “them,” to put it roughly. And I don’t know if I feel as bothered by that because transracial adoption, even in the best of circumstances, carries with it a lot of residual (and real-time) power differentials. On the other hand, there’s a way to do it kindly in that case and there’s a rude and judgmental way to do it, too (and I’ve heard plenty of white parents of black kids cite examples of a.a. people who came up to them and did have a problem with the situation and were rude enough to impose hefty judgment, so of course there’s more than enough rudeness, presumption, and entitlement to go around). Actually, I think a white person could ask probing questions about race/family makeup but it would definitely depend on how the conversation is going and how one asked. I’m just not comfortable enough with my own newly-discovered flaw to venture into nuanced territory in terms of my approach. For right now it is better to err on the polite side.

I guess my point is that you can be rude on the playground for lots of different reasons–this is just one of them.

Playground Invasion

One of the things I like best about our new neighborhood is the opportunity it affords me and my son to interact with lots of people who don’t look like us or share all parts of our racial and cultural background. Most evenings we visit our lovely playground the Snapper is either the only Caucasian kid or in a distinct minority. Every night it’s a little different; sometimes he is playing with A.A. kids, sometimes with Hispanic kids, sometimes with immigrant kids, sometimes with kids from family structures unlike his own. I remarked to a friend recently that part of my residual racism is how surprised I was that a neighborhood this nice (which I defined without examination as tree-lined, quiet-ish, well-kept and safe) was largely minority. Egads–of course a neighborhood could be all those thing AND multi-racial/cultural. I understand there is some overlap between the poverty rates among minorities and the persistence of sub-ideal living conditions in poorer communities, but that does NOT translate to minority neighborhood = bad neighborhood. I am ashamed at this particular feature of my until-now buried-to-me stereotyping, but there it is (and hopefully WAS). I just can’t keep it here–it doesn’t hold water. There are as many kinds of black families as there are black families in this neighborhood, as well as Hispanics, foreign-born, etc…

I have had nothing but positive encounters on the playground (in general there are a few people on our walks that I have stopped trying to say hi to, because they are so surly, but this is rare). I find this side of the minor highway that runs alongside downtown far more easygoing than the university side, which doesn’t surprise me (and this is true in other college towns in which I’ve lived that were majority white). I have really enjoyed my evenings here with the Snapper. I’ve met so many nice people who are kind to my son and eager to chat while our children play.

I feel comfortable asking relatively socially acceptable fact-finding questions, such as “so do you live on this block?” or “how old is your daughter?” or, if the conversation moves forward, “do you go to school or work here in IC?”

But I never, ever ask questions like, “Where are you from?” (unless the person says, “we just moved here,” in which case I might ask where they’ve moved from, which is a different question), or “what is your son?” or “are your children adopted?” or the hideous, “what are you?” or any P.C. version of the above. For awhile I’ve just felt uncomfortable asking these questions. As time progresses I find that my burning curiosity has turned into mild interest, but I no longer feel this sense of entitlement to know what exactly is UP with every family I run into. Because seriously? A family’s specific racial/cultural makeup and sexual activities is none of my damned business. Sometimes it comes up naturally in the conversation, in which case there is usually a comfortable opening for gentle inquiries that the person in question seems open to address. But mostly when these encounters are casual and polite–as they are especially at this stage of our newness in the neighborhood–ages of kids, location of domicile, and place of employment or university department is all one can really push for, and even then it’s a matter of polite interest and not probing. As I contemplated my feelings about these conversations, I realized that I have abdicated a very important White Middle Class entitlement, which is the right to go anywhere and everywhere. Like this article that Kohana linked to recently from Racialicious, “going anywhere” can also mean, “knowing anything,” which from my studies smacks of old-fashioned colonialism: that it is your assumed, unexamined right to satiate your curiosity no matter how offensive or invasive it is.

Now I suppose one could argue that one’s racial or cultural background is not an intimate matter. After all we very often look different from one another and it is not wrong to wonder where someone was born or who their parents were. But what makes it presumptuous to ask is that there is such a wide variety in ways of being, and people should have the right to define that for themselves as in as nuanced a way as they please. “What are you?” asks for a single-dimensional answer. More importantly, racial and cultural background are intimate details, especially if a minority person (or a non-minority, for that matter) has experienced a complex and painful journey surrounding those details. It may be hard to say what one “is” or where one is “from” when speaking with a relative strangers. Those details can slowly unfold as people get to know one another.

The other day the Snapper and I met the sweetest family. They shared their ball with him and spoke kindly to us both. I could tell by their appearance and accent that they were probably South* East Asian, maybe Indian. But maybe they were Pakistani? I didn’t ask. The history of Indian/Pakistani relations is long, complex, and fraught with strife (as well as lots of positive interactions and exchanges, I’m sure). It would have been incredibly rude to ask. Besides, what is it to me? I will not pretend that they aren’t brown or that they speak perfect standard English. That is interesting. But it is not my right to know anything else about them. I hope over time that we will get to know them better, and them us. I secretly hope every time we go that they’ll be there again. No use pushing anything. The difference between the me of now and the me of ten years ago is that what would disappoint me is not getting to know them better as people rather than “finding out” what their “deal” is.

I’ve wondered about the family make-up of groups of people there, I’ve wondered about racial background and even of disability. But I’ve just wondered.

I hope this is growth.

*Believe it or not, this is what I intended to say–just left out the ’south.’  Thanks, anon.

This is where I live…

To those of you who still believe racism is a thing of the past, on both an institutional and individual basis, read this, making especially sure to read the comments. I understand that the comments are skewed toward trollage, but I have personally heard more than one Cedar Rapidian refer to those “people from Chicago” (aka, poor black people mucking up our perfect, safe white city).

I know many, many CR people who do not discriminate and work hard to fight their inner racist.  But clearly we have a long, long way to go.

Welcome back, nuance

This is amazing.

(My thoughts, as they developed: you’re giving too much ground to the anti-your-pastor people, but I see why you’re doing it…but wait! you can explain why you don’t support the manner he expressed his views but that you understand its origins? And that understanding those origins is crucial to bringing about real change? Are politicians even allowed to do that anymore? Wow–talk about walking a fine, fine line elegantly, passionately, persuasively…OK, really, do you have to make me cry? You are trying to break through my cynicism, aren’t you. Dammit, Obama, this is one burned-out, fed-up, disavowing white liberal who is now willing to jump on your bandwagon wholeheartedly. I can hear you sniveling, friends of mine who will chalk it up to my gullibility for good rhetoric. All I can say is, “bite me.” It’s been a long, long time since we’ve had a candidate that wasn’t merely ‘least bad’ but BEST. Holy shit.)

What’s that? You say that for the first time a post on race and politics is NOT going to be tagged “I’m angry today?” Really??

(P.S. Obviously there are a few things on which I could take him to task. I am not convinced that the American People are inherently decent and that whites aren’t inherently [if usually unconsciously] racist. Plus a bunch of other stuff that’s informed by my education and reading in race, particularly my loathing for the myth of progress [are we reliving the nineteenth century?]. BUT here is someone who is saying [out loud!] that the job is not done. I love the moxie. Oh, and yes, it’s mixed in with a lot of “look how far we’ve come”-ness but I can accept that as part of the rhetoric that is most likely to draw people who aren’t cynics like me in.)

ETA: I did remove some melodramatic text. I should probably give myself a day before posting on things that inspire me.

ETA: Jonathan over at Bitch, PhD, says this in the comments and sums up my main critique of Obama’s speech: “The theme of the speech is American exceptionalism. Within this patriotic context he is able skillfully to link various imperfections together: Geraldine Ferraro, the rhetoric of his own “former” pastor; slavery; lower-middle class White resentment at immigration and affirmative action; even his own Grandmothers’ racism. He explains all of this as part of the unfulfilled promise of America. The narrow aim of the speech–distancing himself from Wright–is subsumed under this wider goal: making his own election seem like the logical culmination of the slow march of progress toward the unachieved ideals enshrined in the constitution. He’s spinning a negative into a positive.”  Overall, though, I still like it.

Privilege (again)

Third Mom writes, commenting on contemplating my status as a woman,

But I also think that on some level it doesn’t matter, because at the end of the day it’s a luxury to even be able to consider this question.

And she’s right.  I have so much else that puts me in the category of ‘privileged’–I’m white, American, middle-class, straight, Christian and non-disabled.  I stayed with the mother who bore me and was raised in a two-parent, same-race family.  I try to be ever mindful of my privilege, and indeed I had a post in my head this weekend: “Privilege: Group Home Edition.” Back in the annals of Boomerific in a post I can’t find–I think it may even be from when I was on blogger–I listed all the things that made me privileged, and I think most of them were class-based.  The post in my head has a lot of things most of us without disabilities take for granted: I can walk (mostly) wherever I want without assistance, I can bathe myself, I do not rely on medication to live, I do not live with stares and condescending comments.

But.  Mostly is the key; ‘woman’ is my category of difference, and despite the fact that my other privileges almost trump it, it’s still a very real impediment in my life.  I don’t mean to speak for other women, though it is true that all women are never completely safe walking on their own at night.  Some women (me) are safer than others, true.  But this series is about me and how I am coming to terms with how my personal definition of woman, as handed to me and subsequently interpreted by me, is problematic in my own life.  In that way, yes, it IS a luxury question.  I wish I had a more high-minded thing to blog about for November, especially because during this month we get so many new readers through that thing that begins with N that I hate scrolling down to find so that I can spell correctly.  Bringing more attention to adoption reform, like Third Mom has done, among others, would be a good thing to do.

All I can say is that I need to do this now, for me.  It’s kind of related to me getting a therapist to work through my confidence issues (which may after all be connected)–for a while I balked thinking that it was the height of arrogance for a person with no more than a diagnosis for a relatively benign form of ADHD to seek counseling.  One husband and two friends later I gave into the fact that I still needed it, that trying to do good things for people who need help requires one to be of sound mind oneself.  So to be able to finish my degree and teach, which I am itching to do, and to be a better mother to my son and my future children, and to just be as healthy I can be for myself, I am going to therapy and I am exploring what it means for me to be a woman.  I haven’t forgotten everyone else.  I promise.

(and T.M. I love you and know you weren’t trying to be snippy in the least.  this is something I wanted to write about anyway)

 

First pierogi

I got the job, officially.  When flipping through the paperwork I had to bring with me to the pre-hire physical I was reminded that this whole working outside the home deal is going to be a hassle.  But speaking with my mother-in-law, whose post-kid career has her taking care of lots of people less physically or mentally capable than her, and hearing her urge me to read Matthew 25 again, reminds me of how grateful I am that it’s at least a job that will mean something and will not just be another round of me cheerfully helping someone else make even more dough.

Home projects: Debabyification continues with the CDs moved to wallets and jewel cases stored in the basement.  With alphabetization, two days.  I keep telling myself that a tidy house makes me work more efficiently (whether or not cleaning the mess actually replaces work time–sometimes just having the mess puts me on edge) but I can’t help but cringe at the time I lost.  We also switched from shower doors (ugh and ugly) to a rod and curtains and got a detachable shower head so we can bathe the dogs again.  Mundane to you, maybe, but for me a major quality-of-life issue, as it makes bathing the Snapper much easier and safer, and also because a snazzy new curtain makes the ugly ancient bathroom look not so bad.

Thinking: Emailing back and forth with another Women for Peace Iowa member on how to create community among very different people in ways that will promote peace locally.  I have some ideas but I feel really out of my depth.  I’m just a white girl who grew up in largely white communities (with some interesting variations, but that’s another story) and I’m not sure how to bring people together artificially (at first) in a way that will stick.

Thinking adoption: When we were in the thick of the adoption process over a year ago we were baby-crazy.  Looking back, we accepted things ethically that we would never accept now, and however much I’d like to think it’s all my newly discovered knowledge I have to admit that it was also baby craziness.  For example, we became suspicious that our agency (or rather the agency they were working with across state) was not providing adequate counseling to the women we were being ‘matched’ with.  I think we were far too willing to let that suspicion fade into the background.  I would have no qualms now making sure that proper counseling (with lots of information about parenting, child support, the psychological effects of placing, etc.) was happening before I worked with an agency.  Now unless third-party counseling is employed I’ll always be less than satisfied (and even then who will pay the third party? Babies and money will always be too bound up in ways that end up favoring adoptive parents) but I’m not close to ideas for how it could be implemented.  I also would not have accepted our social worker saying things like, “I know you want to encourage her to nurse but just be aware that birthmothers who do that almost never place,” as if we were supposed to just tiptoe around a mother so she wouldn’t change her mind.  It was all about assessing the risk and she was forever reassuring us that a changed mind was rare.  What I’d like to hear NOW is “she won’t really place until after the baby is born.  No one knows what is in a mother’s heart, but what we’ll pray for is that she makes the right decision for her and her baby.”

Regarding the retrospective opinion on not-Boomer’s mother deciding not to place: Here’s the thing.  I do believe that people have incredible reserves, particularly when it comes to their children.  I would like to believe that not-Boomer is doing well.  But I’m also intimately acquainted, through Attic Man’s time as a welfare caseworker in not-Boomer’s mother’s state, that while no child starves on welfare, many (not all–lots of things come into play here) of them are malnourished.  Cash assistance is a pittance, food assistance is a pittance, and until this year WIC didn’t provide for fresh fruits and vegetables (it’s tied to the Farm Bill and subsidies–did you know that?).  I’m not saying that she shouldn’t have placed.  I’m not saying that we would be a better family for not-Boomer than hers because we have more money.  But it’s not as simple as saying that love is enough and as long as he’s with his first mother he’ll be alright.  Most likely he will be alright in some ways and not in others, just as he would be, with other combinations, in our family.  The balance sheet isn’t clear and it isn’t up to us to decide which way the scales tip.

The Snapper has his very first cold and is simultaneously miserable and adorable.

About Looking Good

I am a tee-shirts and jeans kind of gal. I get bored blow-drying my hair and I’m bad at using the round brush so I don’t do it. Lately it goes up into a bun where little hands can’t yank it out of my head. I only put makeup on when I’m leaving the house and sometimes not even then. I tweeze intermittently, when the mood strikes. I’ve never figured out how to put together a smart-looking wardrobe that doesn’t cost a lot of money, and since I’ve never had a lot of money, I’ve never had a smart-looking wardrobe.

The above has a lot to do with being lazy but even more to do with privilege. I don’t have to worry that someone will see my raggedy ass and look down his or her nose at me (at least not in this neighborhood, in this city). I don’t live in that impossible space where if you don’t look good people cluck and say, “no wonder she can’t get a job, she’s so raggedy, she should really care more about her appearance, it’s her fault she’s poor,” and if you look fabulous people cluck and say, “if she spent her money on resume paper instead of that new weave she’d be able to get a job, I can’t believe my money goes towards getting her nails done [sidebar: who in their right mind thinks welfare is enough for this type of bullshit? too many people get miseducated by talk radio]” Of course I do dress up if I’m going to meet with professors or go to even a temp job, but day-to-day I can wear the same pair of jeans for a week and nobody will say boo.

Similarly, if my kid wears a stained onesie it’s because I’m a busy mother and kids are just messy, right? It’s not because I’m unfit and someone really should take those kids and put them with a mother who will do their laundry and clean their faces, for goodness’ sake. For the record, I’m talking about race and class both here. I may not be donning makeup but I have teeth that silently attest to excellent dental care, a face that I’m told looks years my junior (good nutrition, clean water), and as soon as I open my mouth my education is there for everyone to see. And despite the fact that I look a little young I am clearly not a teen mother, and my wedding ring says that my kid is not from one of those (gasp!) ‘broken homes.’

Since we plan on adopting where the need is, we will most likely end up with a non-Caucasian child. If fact, we prepared for not-Boomer to the point that we really feel a not-Boomer shaped hole in our family, so we’re most drawn to a transracial kind of situation. And we still feel good about our ability to do that kind of parenting. But we’re also still learning and I see this extra time as a gift to think even more about the implications.

Some people have been posting about the importance of hair and appearance for adoptees of color (please don’t kill me for being too lazy to link–the latest one was a link from another blog I link and I can’t find it again) and I am in full agreement that because hair is so loaded for a lot of black people it’s crucial for white parents to learn how to do it correctly, and also that appearance in general can communicate, “I care enough about my child to make sure she looks good.” Because I understand that we live in a world that looks at my son and says, “cute! bananas smashed on a baby’s face is adorable!” but will look at my other son(s) or daughter(s) and say, “see, black people are dirty and irresponsible.” Or, if he/she is Asian, “I thought Asians were supposed to be perfectly clean and neat. What’s wrong with this one?” Now I realize there are about a thousand nuances to the above but the general racism, no matter how seemingly innocuous, means that color and class very often come into play with kids and their appearance in public. And I am 100% OK with putting aside my laziness about my own appearance to make sure my kids don’t have to constantly put up with judgments about their hair and clothes on top of everything else, most of which I can’t control. A lot of this is shorthand and if you want me to expand it I can, but it’s not the main point of the post.

What I’m getting to is that Attic Man and I have to start thinking about how to parent the Snapper with our future family plans NOW. I was lurking on a POC (people of color) message board once and someone was saying that because black kids are judged very harshly for any bad behavior (even to the point of being put in special ed at far greater rates even when no learning disability or mental problem is present), it’s OK for a parent of both black and white children to have a double standard. I was horrified that anyone would think it’s OK to have different behavioral standards for your kids just because the social consequences are different. When you have people of color in your family, you give up some privileges. So what if the Snapper is not going to get followed around by security guards in a department store? If his brother can’t horse around neither can he. We can’t do anything about the inequities outside, but we sure as hell aren’t going to replicate them in our own home.

Which takes me to appearance, and is why I’m carefully screening the Snapper’s clothing for stains and making sure there’s no dried banana on his face before we leave the house (at home, the onesie is king). I want to get used to, and get him used to, giving up the privilege of looking raggedy. Believe me, if we weren’t planning on adding to our family in this particular way, I wouldn’t expend the energy. But I don’t want him to hit four or five and all of the sudden have a different set of standards.

One of the things I’m juggling mentally is how to accomplish all of this without reinforcing materialism and commercialism or shallow appearance-ism. What I’m going to teach my kids is that being well groomed and behaved communicates self-respect to people. Until they get to know you, it’s all they have to go on. You have to make sure that how you feel about yourself on the inside gets heard on the outside. It’s NOT going to be about brand names or the latest of anything. It’s going to be about being neat and clean (and hopefully creative) and that’s all. Maybe they’ll get teased for not having the latest $400 sneakers but not for being unkempt, and I’m OK with that. As far as I’m concerned the former is a rite of passage, but the latter is avoidable, and completely in keeping with our family’s values. I’m alright with them internalizing that their family is old-fashioned or uncool but not that they’re dirty or bad.

Sorry, Snapper, but I’m already taking away privileges

Brown Babies, cont.

Ugh.  I just re-read my post and I got something wrong.  I don’t think brown babies are pretty-ER.  Or more desirable than white children to me.  It’s the attraction that I’m concerned about.  I’ve been around white babies all my life, and some real cuties at that (if you saw my nephews you’d want to nibble their cheeks, too!).  Brown babies just catch my attention more readily.  And that part is all mixed up with the fact that I almost parented one–an unsatisfied desire born of an almost-real situation.  Bizarre.

The other thing is that I wonder if this will all change when the Snapper is born and I experience parental love for the first (out-of-utero) time, when he suddenly becomes the most beautiful child I know (until his siblings come, whatever skin color) and when I realize how very different he actually is from me despite our sharing significant genetic material and some, um, very intimate time in the womb (no one’s head should be where his head is right now.  Ever.)

And then I also wonder how it all will change when we re-enter the adoption process, especially as we are still committed to parenting outside of our race (if that indeed still works for us, and I think it will).  Will the day-to-day realities break up the romantic notions?

Three Things

1.  Thanks for the reassurance—it was comforting, don’t get me wrong—but I do think there’s a discriminatory element to my Brown Babies dilemma that goes beyond my specific emotional connection to not-Boomer.  It was a problem before we were very deeply at all in the adoption process.  I also want to say that I don’t think I’m some kind of horrible racist, but that every cultural tendency exists as a spectrum of attitudes of varying severity.  Just where to draw the line between what is appropriate and not is where it gets hairy.  Last spring I talked a lot with my students about how the Cult of the Child (a nineteenth-century phenomenon that we still have with us: an obsession with children that sometimes goes so far to sexualize them [see “Little Miss Sunshine.”  No, really, do!  It’s a fabulous flick]) is present both in pedophilia, which is definitely not OK, and in Anne Geddes photographs, most of which offend very few of us.  We discussed how hard it is to examine yourself and see how you can be outraged at child beauty pageants but still hold Cult of the Child attitudes yourself.  So while I’m obviously not in the same camp as skeevy guys who rent videos featuring hot “urban” women, my thinking that brown babies are prettier or more desirable (non-sexually, duh) is part of a white tendency to exoticize people of color, and I have to figure out what to do with that.  Whether it’s just a matter of liking difference, which may also be a personality trait (I’ve always made friends with people very unlike myself, regardless of race) or something more sinister is what I have to figure out.  I doubt I’ll ever understand it completely, but I owe it to my family to try.

2. Babymoon was a great success.  We swam, hot-tubbed (at a safe temperature, of course), movied (you must, must, must see the new Bond—incredible), read magazines whilst sipping coffee and nibbling desserts at Mega Book Store, finished shopping for the baby, filled out the beginning of the Snapper’s baby book, went out to lunch, had a marvelous walk/romp in the dog park, had dinner delivered to our room, watched SNL from the tub, cuddled, and generally had a good old relaxing time.

3.  It’s funny how the words “still pregnant” change throughout a pregnancy.  At first they’re words of relief: “I’m still pregnant, thank God!”  At some point, though, they become heavy with fatigue: “yep…STILL pregnant, unfortunately…”  My body is worn out, tired, fed up.  Please send good labor vibes in this direction.

Brown Babies

I am supposed to be reading, and I will return to it in a few minutes. I am temporarily frustrated that most of what there is to read on my poet is biographical and very little of it is critical. Guess where that puts me? In the both enviable and unfortunate position of a pioneer. Great.

I’m afraid to write about my Brown Babies dilemma. I think part of being white in this country is being caught in this constant trap of not wanting to think oneself as racist but working hard to acknowledge the pervasive, subconscious racism that is part of a white upbringing. Our adoption process has brought these issues to the fore and I am still struggling with them. As mamamarta has admitted, and as I will echo, I am no stranger to race in an academic or even in a practical sense. But I am nowhere near a comfortable level of ease in the discussion of race. I have learned to talk about race with my students, but I am not at ease with discussing it with myself.

Lately, and I think this is par for the course, I’ve been revisting our experience of losing/never having not-Boomer in February. This pregnancy has been bizarre in that regard, in no small degree due to the fact that it came a mere month after our loss. We were a little shocked to get pregnant that quickly–we meant to open ourselves up to it, expecting nothing (loss makes you frame things that way, too). So all of the sudden we were operating in a whole different context in relation to having a child, and this context was also not quite the same if we had started with biological children and not tried to adopt first. It all became tangled up. I had to work through what it meant to me to have a biological child as opposed to an adopted one. Simplistically, it meant (and means) that I am having a child in a different way. Biology still doesn’t matter much in terms of a value comparison–it’s just different.

But because we were planning on a transracial adoption, the issues surrounding race have become more complicated. As I’ve explained before, we began our adoption journey being open to a child of any “race.” We believed when we started the process that children of color were in greater need of adoption (and subsequently learned that this is only true for children in foster care), and many agencies have separate programs. So we were compelled, I think, to make a choice. And we ultimately decided that our level of education, Attic Man’s experience as a sibling of transracially adopted siblings, our own attitudes about race, and our willingness to make radical life-decisions based on our children’s unique needs made us good, but not perfect candidates.

Here’s where it gets complicated. I am a visual dreamer. I like to picture the future. I do this with things I’m anxious about, too, because it feels like a rehearsal and makes me feel more prepared (I’ve done this a lot with the birth experience, and it’s done a lot to quel my fears). Consequently, I spent over a year picturing myself holding a brown baby with black hair. I imagined putting a little girl’s curls in puffs and learning how to braid. I closed my eyes and talked myself through the things that family, friends, and strangers would say to and about our family. I was fully immersed in the dream of parenting a brown baby as a white woman.

Now I’ve found that pictures of brown babies give me a pang of sadness, especially when they appear on blogs of people who have adopted them transracially. I didn’t have any idea I’d have this reaction, and I’m starting to feel uncomfortable with it. I’ll put it bluntly: is this a racist reaction? Have I become romantically enamoured with difference? I’m starting to think about how much more I like to be in churches in which I am among a very few white members, or for that matter in restaurants and malls and at concerts. There’s a level of happiness I get from that kind of experience that I don’t get from typically ‘white’ contexts. I don’t know why this is or where it comes from, and it worries me. Am I fetishizing brown children, and people of color in general? Am I no better than a white suburban teenager who carelessly appropriates race because of a need for excitement (or is even that more complicated than I’m making it out to be)?

The Snapper is going to be glowingly, transparently white like his parents. I’m not at all disappointed in having a white child and besides, with how much we have learned I know he’s not going to have the typical ‘white’ experience, especially if we do go forward with our plans to adopt transracially in the future. What worries me is that my own attitudes may be no better than the primitivistic attitudes of the worst kind of racist. I just don’t know what to do with it.